When is this better than a Blueprint Sprint?
Use this when the work is larger than one architecture sprint and requires program governance across multiple teams or platforms.
CUSTOM
4 to 12 months · $250K to $1.2M+
Scope Custom Azure Expansion With Architecture Control.
Use custom expansion after Assessment, Blueprint, Build, Architecture Office, or Governance shows that a larger Azure, data, AI, or platform program needs a governed roadmap and delivery plan.
Use This When
Use This When the Team Needs Clearer Scope.
The work touches several teams, platforms, or vendor groups.
Architecture, delivery, cost, security, and governance need one operating model.
Sponsors and owners need roadmap clarity and monthly progress visibility.
The program needs delivery pods, change control, QA gates, and risk management.
Delivery Structure
How the Engagement Moves Forward.
- 01Program discovery and roadmap setup
- 02Architecture, governance, and delivery operating model
- 03Workstream planning across cloud, data, AI, platform, and operations
- 04Stakeholder reporting, QA gates, and change control
Outcomes
What the Service Clarifies.
Outputs stay practical: current state, risks, owners, recommended actions, and handoff notes.
- Connects custom expansion work to business outcomes and budget priorities.
- Creates a governed roadmap across Azure, AI, data, platform, and operations.
- Improves decision quality across vendors, internal teams, and owners.
- Keeps program reporting tied to progress, risk, cost, and production readiness.
- Custom expansion roadmap
- Workstreams and delivery pods
- Architecture and governance operating model
- Stakeholder reporting rhythm
- Risk, issue, dependency, and change control model
Assess program current state and business case.
Prioritize workstreams by value, risk, feasibility, and dependency.
Architect shared platform, data, AI, security, and governance patterns.
Run delivery through reporting, owners, QA gates, and change control.
Questions
Questions Before You Book.
Use the first call to confirm the goal, timeline, and whether this service matches the work.
Does this replace the delivery team?
No. The engagement provides architecture, governance, quality review, and delivery control. Implementation responsibilities stay inside the approved scope.
How is progress managed?
Progress is managed through roadmap, workstreams, QA gates, risk tracking, change control, and reporting.
Bring the Initiative That Needs Architecture Judgment.
The first call helps confirm whether this service makes sense or whether the work should stay internal.